We establish the facts.
We establish which tools are in use, who uses them, what information is shared and where approval may be missing.
Your team is already using AI to draft advice, analyse figures and work with client information. An answer can sound convincing and still be wrong. Sensitive data may leave your control without anyone realising. If something goes wrong, who will answer for it? We help you find the exposure, establish safeguards and stay in control.
If you cannot answer these questions, you may already be exposed.
We help you establish where the risks lie, and what to do about them.
We help UK SMEs and professional firms adopt AI responsibly. If your team uses ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot or AI features within existing business systems, we help you understand the risks to confidential information, reliability and accountability.
Accountancy, legal, consultancy and other advice-led firms.
Businesses using AI across reporting, analysis and operations.
Schools and education providers navigating staff and student AI use.
Teams looking to formalise AI governance before risk outpaces control.
We assess how AI is already being used across your organisation, identify risks that may have gone unnoticed, and help you introduce the policies, safeguards and approval processes needed to manage them. We then provide continuing oversight as your use of AI develops, so you can embrace its benefits with greater confidence.
We establish which tools are in use, who uses them, what information is shared and where approval may be missing.
We assess critical outputs and put proportionate checks, policies and safeguards in place to reduce the risk of errors.
We define ownership, approvals and monitoring responsibilities, and help maintain evidence that the controls are working.
It takes minutes. The draft reads well, the fee earner is busy, and the contract goes to the client with only a quick review. Nothing seems unusual until there is a dispute.
These are illustrative potential outcomes, not a report of an actual case. The same pattern could arise with AI-drafted advice, accounts, reports or client letters.
An omitted limitation of liability leaves the client exposed and the firm facing questions over the quality of its advice.
The contract is disputed. The client may seek redress. The firm must explain what was checked before it gave its advice.
Client information was entered into a tool that nobody approved or assessed. Confidentiality and data protection concerns now sit alongside the original mistake.
We would examine the tool, its treatment of client data and the firm’s checking procedures, then help introduce clear approval, review and escalation controls.
See how we helpStart with an independent assessment. We can then establish the necessary policies, records and controls, and maintain them as your use of AI changes.
We examine how AI is being used, identify gaps in safeguards and explain the practical steps needed to reduce your exposure.
We develop and embed proportionate policies, risk assessments, approval processes and checks, with guidance from us on applying them.
We maintain your governance arrangements, consider new AI tools and uses, assess and help mitigate emerging risks, and talk decisions through with you.
For organisations seeking a more substantial, independent-minded examination, we review the maturity and operation of your AI governance arrangements against relevant ISO/IEC 42001 requirements. We discuss findings with leadership and provide a prioritised improvement report.
Indicative SME fees, excluding VAT. Final scope depends on organisation size, AI use and complexity. Services are advisory and do not constitute accredited ISO certification.
Our work is informed by AIME and relevant ISO/IEC 42001 principles where appropriate. The scope reflects the organisation and the risks involved.
We map your AI tools, use cases, data flows and responsibilities.
We evaluate material risks, supplier dependencies and weaknesses in current controls.
We develop proportionate policies, records and accountable processes with your team.
We revisit the risks, update the records and report material changes to management.
Depending on the scope of your engagement, we help establish and maintain the working documents and controls your organisation needs.
AI does not stand still. Employees try new tools, existing systems change and new uses bring different risks. We review these developments, assess the potential impact, recommend safeguards and help keep your policies, controls and records current. You can concentrate on using AI, knowing its governance is being looked after.
Through regular reviews, management updates and direct discussions when decisions arise, we help you maintain proportionate oversight without having to build a dedicated internal function.
Explore ongoing oversightVisibility of tools, use cases and those accountable for them.
Documentation that evolves alongside your operation.
Regular reviews, practical actions and leadership updates.
A professional sounding board when new AI decisions arise.
Our approach is rooted in more than 20 years of professional audit, financial reporting and control experience, combined with hands-on knowledge of AI, technology and the finance systems businesses rely on. We know how to challenge a process, assess evidence and turn a finding into a practical improvement.
An understanding of risk, internal controls, testing and documented evidence, with the professional scepticism to examine whether procedures work in practice.
Direct experience of AI systems, digital processes and implementation challenges, including their operational limitations and changing capabilities.
Familiarity with reporting, business systems, confidentiality and the consequences when information or controls cannot be relied upon.
Some common questions about the scope of our work and how engagements begin.
Potentially, yes. Even everyday tools raise questions around confidential data, accuracy, human review, appropriate use and accountability. The appropriate controls depend on how your organisation uses them.
No. We can use ISO/IEC 42001 as a framework for gap assessments and governance improvement, but certification is a separate process undertaken by an appropriate certification body.
Absolutely. The initial review provides a sensible baseline and practical priorities. We can then help establish the framework and maintain it through our outsourced governance service.
Our approach is to help you adopt AI responsibly, not prohibit it by default. We focus on clear boundaries, sensible control measures and appropriate human oversight.
It depends on the information, the AI product, your organisation’s contractual arrangements and the safeguards in place. We review which tools are used, where information goes and whether staff have clear, appropriate rules before entering sensitive material.
AI can produce convincing but incorrect work. We help identify high-risk uses, define checks and human approval points, and put appropriate evidence and escalation procedures in place.
If staff already use AI for client work, drafting, finance or decisions, proportionate written rules help clarify what is permitted, what needs review and who is responsible. We help tailor those rules to your actual use, rather than issuing a generic policy.
Tell us how your organisation uses AI. We will discuss your potential exposure, explain where a review could help and recommend a sensible next step.